This was the address (Burke provocatively calls it a ‘sermon’) given by Rev. However, although Burke presents Depont’s letter as the occasion for writing Reflections, it would be naïve to see it only in this way, or indeed, addressed only to the French.Ĭoincidently, on 4 November, the date of Depont’s first letter, another event contributed decisively to the nature of Reflections, shaping its opening passages and rendering the English its real target audience (as Burke would put it in a letter: ‘my Object was not France, in the first instance, but this Country’ ). The opening of Reflections refers both to Depont’s second letter pressing Burke for a reply and to the withheld letter, which had finally been sent. Burke’s initial reply, expressing grave misgivings about the Revolution, had been withheld, lest it compromise Depont, in favour of a brief noncommittal response, now lost. Charles-Jean-Francois Depont, a young French acquaintance, had written asking Burke for assurance that the French were, ‘worthy to be free, could distinguish between liberty and licence, and between legitimate government and despotic power’ (C, VI: 32). The epistolary device – widely used by Burke – had a basis in fact. It purports to be a letter explaining, to a Frenchman, the author’s views on the Revolution and distinguishing between what we would today call the political cultures of Britain and of revolutionary France. It has often since been held to define and shape the conservative alternative to revolutionary principles.

Reflections on the Revolution in France was by far the most famous literary response to that liminal event of political modernity.

Reflections of the french revolution